In-situ or extractive measurement: where is moisture control needed in your gas analysis?
The three measurement methods compared, and what each of them requires in terms of sample conditioning
Moisture control in gas analysis is not a matter of simply installing a dryer as standard. Where and how you need to control moisture depends entirely on the chosen measurement method. An in-situ analyser imposes completely different requirements from an extractive system, and within extractive systems, a hot-wet set-up differs fundamentally from a cool-dry set-up.
Almost every industrial gas stream contains water. As long as that water remains in vapour form, there is little to worry about. The problem arises when the gas stream drops below the dew point and condensation occurs. Uncontrolled condensation can damage an analyser beyond repair, and tracing the cause often takes more man-hours than replacing the components themselves.
This article covers the three main methods of gas analysis, their strengths and weaknesses, and the question that follows from them: where in your measurement set-up is moisture control actually required?
⏱ approx. 9 minutes reading time
Why water is so problematic in gas analysis
Water in a gas stream causes four types of problems, which often occur at the same time.
| Problem | What happens | Consequence |
| Condensation in the sample line | Gas cools below the dew point; water condenses | Blockage, pressure fluctuations, unreliable flow |
| Loss of water-soluble analytes | SO2 and NOx dissolve in the condensate | Structural measurement error; up to 90 percent loss at low SO2 levels |
| Spectral interference | Water vapour absorbs in the same wavelength ranges as the analytes | Falsely increased or decreased readings |
| Corrosion and sensor damage | Condensate in combination with acid gases attacks components | Replacement of sensors, cells and piping |
| Dilution effect | Water vapour takes up volume in the gas stream | All concentrations are measured too low |
The hidden costs of condensation
When condensation damages an analyser, it rarely ends with replacing a cell or sensor. Tracing the cause often takes many man-hours, and during that period the system produces data of questionable quality. In regulated emission measurements, this can lead to reporting problems.
Method 1: In-situ measurement
In in-situ analysis, measurement takes place directly in the process gas stream, without sampling. The measuring head or the optical path is located in the duct or the stack itself.
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Measures at exactly the desired point | Electronics and controls are located remotely |
| No sampling system required | Exposure to aggressive process conditions |
| No transport delay | Measuring low concentrations is difficult |
| No loss of analytes in lines | High spectral interference, partly due to water vapour |
| Fewer mechanical components | Calibration gas must be brought to the measuring location |
| Boundary layer effects at the wall affect the measurement |
Where does the moisture problem lie with in-situ measurement?
In in-situ systems, the moisture is not removed, because there is no sample stream to condition. Water therefore remains present in the measurement and mainly causes two effects: spectral interference, in which water vapour absorbs in wavelength ranges that overlap with the components to be measured, and the dilution effect, in which the water vapour takes up part of the gas volume.
The solution here is not a dryer but a correction: many in-situ analysers measure the water content at the same time and convert the readings to a dry basis. That works, but introduces an additional source of uncertainty into the measurement.
When in-situ is the right choice
In-situ measurement suits applications in which a fast response time is crucial, high concentrations are measured and the process conditions are not extremely aggressive. For low concentrations and regulated emission measurements, an extractive system is generally more reliable.
Method 2: Extractive hot-wet
In a hot-wet system, a sample is extracted and transported to the analyser fully heated, without removing the water. The entire sample line, filters and analyser cell are kept above the dew point.
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Accurate measurements of the actual gas stream | Cold spots lead directly to condensation |
| Sample integrity is maintained | Energy-intensive due to continuous heating |
| No loss of water-soluble components | High risk of corrosion with acid gases |
| Simpler analyser maintenance | Uncontrolled heating can fractionate the sample |
| Suitable for NH3, HCl and other reactive gases | High maintenance costs of the heated line |
Where does the moisture problem lie with hot-wet?
The whole challenge of a hot-wet system is preventing cold spots. A single unheated fitting, a poorly insulated bend or a defective heating element causes local condensation. At that point, water condenses, water-soluble components dissolve and corrosion develops.
Moisture control here therefore does not mean drying but temperature control over the entire path from probe head to analyser cell. Every component must stay above the dew point, with a safety margin.
The most common point of failure
Couplings and transitions between heated and unheated sections are where condensation almost always occurs first. In the event of a recurring condensation problem, first check the connections of the heated sample line to the analyser.
Method 3: Extractive cool-dry
In a cool-dry system, the sample is extracted, filtered and dried before it reaches the analyser. The analyser then works with a dry, clean gas stream at ambient temperature. This is the most widely used method in continuous emission monitoring and process analysis.
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Analyser works under stable conditions | Risk of loss of water-soluble analytes |
| Considerably lower energy consumption | Requires a well-designed conditioning system |
| Lower risk of corrosion in the analyser | Additional components that require maintenance |
| Longer service life of sensors and cells | Response time is longer than with in-situ |
| Suitable for low concentrations | The drying method determines whether analytes are retained |
Where does the moisture problem lie with cool-dry?
This is the heart of the conditioning issue. The way you dry determines whether your measurement is reliable. Not every drying method is selective for water, and non-selective drying costs you analytes.
Drying methods compared: which one retains your analytes?
This is the point where many measurement set-ups go wrong. Traditional drying methods remove not only water but also some of the components to be measured.
| Drying method | Operating principle | Selectivity for water |
| Condensation cooler | Gas cools below the dew point; water is drained off | Not selective. Water-soluble gases such as SO2 and NOx dissolve in the condensate |
| Adsorption dryer (silica gel) | Water binds to an absorbent material | Not selective. Also adsorbs other polar components; requires regeneration |
| Permeation dryer in general | Water diffuses through a membrane | Depends on the membrane material; some also let analytes through |
| Nafion membrane dryer | Water binds chemically to sulphonic acid groups and is transported through ion channels | Highly selective. Virtually only water; exceptions are ammonia and alcohols |
Why Nafion is selective
Nafion is a copolymer incorporating sulphonic acid groups. These groups chemically bind water molecules and form ion channels through the polymer. Water molecules are transported from one sulphonic acid group to the next until they reach the outside of the wall.
There are no physical pores in the material. Transport takes place via a first-order kinetic process that is specific to water. Other gas components do not pass through the wall, so the composition of the sample is preserved.
Practical consequence: at low SO2 levels, traditional coolers lose up to 90 percent of the analyte and are unsuitable for accurate measurements. Nafion-based systems are the only solution that removes moisture without affecting the SO2 content.
Combination drying for extremely low dew points
For dew points lower than can be achieved with Nafion alone, a combination is often used. The Nafion dryer acts as the first stage and removes up to 95 percent of the moisture. A secondary dryer or coalescing filter completes the job. This set-up considerably extends the service life of the second stage and thus lowers operating costs.
The conditioning path in three zones
A complete cool-dry conditioning system is made up of three functional zones. Understanding this structure makes it clear why each component is needed.
Zone 1: sample cleaning and preparation (heated)
From the probe, the sample flows through the heated part of the system. First, it passes a heated 0.1 micrometre coalescing filter, followed if necessary by an ammonia scrubber. This step removes acid mists, particles and ammonia, so that the Nafion dryer continues to work effectively over a longer period.
Zone 2: heated inlet of the dryer
The sample flows through the heated part of the dryer. This heating keeps the water in the vapour phase, so that it is removed through the membrane as vapour and no water condenses anywhere.
Zone 3: unheated outlet of the dryer
In the second half of the dryer, in the unheated part of the system, the sample is cooled and further dried to a dew point of, for example, -25 degrees Celsius. From here, the sample goes to the analyser. The system's electronics are also located in this unheated section.
Protect your Nafion dryer
Ammonia and alcohols do pass through the Nafion membrane and can eventually damage the dryer. In gas streams containing ammonia, an ammonia scrubber upstream of the dryer is not an option but a necessity for the service life of the system.
Which method suits your application?
| Situation | Recommended method | Conditioning requirement |
| High concentrations, fast response required | In-situ | Water correction in the analyser; no drying |
| Reactive gases such as NH3 and HCl | Extractive hot-wet | Full heat tracing; no cold spots |
| Low SO2 and NOx levels (CEMS) | Extractive cool-dry with Nafion | Selective drying; retention of analytes |
| Emission measurement after flue gas desulphurisation | Extractive cool-dry with Nafion | Low levels require analyte retention |
| Laboratory or OEM analyser | Extractive cool-dry, compact dryer | Membrane dryer integrated into the instrument |
| Aerosol-laden gas streams | Extractive cool-dry, special dryer | Dryer with increased capacity for aerosols |
Frequently asked questions about moisture control in gas analysis
What is the difference between a Nafion dryer and a condensation cooler?
A condensation cooler cools the gas below the dew point so that water becomes liquid and can be drained off. Water-soluble components dissolve in the condensate and disappear from the measurement. A Nafion dryer removes only water vapour via the membrane; all other components remain in the gas stream. For measuring SO2, NOx and other water-soluble gases, that difference is decisive.
Which components do pass through the Nafion membrane?
Nafion is highly selective for water, but ammonia and alcohols can also pass through the membrane. In gas streams containing ammonia, an ammonia scrubber is therefore placed upstream of the dryer. For all other common analyte gases, the composition of the sample remains unchanged.
What dew point can I achieve with a Nafion dryer?
The achievable dew point depends on the temperature, the sample flow, the dew point of the purge gas and the chosen dryer size. Dew points down to -25 degrees Celsius are achievable with a properly sized system; lower is possible with specific configurations and dry purge gas. For extremely low dew points, Nafion is combined with a second drying stage.
How much purge gas do I need?
As a rule of thumb, a purge gas flow of approximately three times the sample gas flow is used. The purge gas can be dry instrument air, nitrogen or part of the dried sample gas. When vacuum is used as the driving force, different sizing rules apply.
Can I use a Nafion dryer at high temperatures?
Nafion itself is stable up to approximately 160 degrees Celsius, but the housing material and the end fittings impose a lower limit. Even with PTFE or stainless steel housings, the gas temperature must not exceed 150 degrees Celsius. Moreover, at higher temperatures the Nafion wall retains water more strongly, which reduces the drying capacity.








































